?>


Creative Forum


Moderated By: KM8
Ngala
Posted: Posted July 11th, 2008 by Sano
View Source Report Thread Views

Ngala

An inscriptional system of quasi-featural glyphs, mostly monosyllabic.



As you see there is a spot for each radical, onset, nucleus and coda. The red squares are potential connection points.

To form many words the 2nd nucleus position is needed and can be seen in a few of the examples below. But first, the radical values:



As you can see, each radical has two to three varying values depending on where it falls in the glyph.

I have followed the lead of fmra in reverse engineering a few of these glyphs to be somewhat pictographic, please pay no attention to my child-like artistic inabilities.



myong /mjo:N/ - n. a large feline, tiger lion…etc

As you can see, each radical spot is used, top left: M, bottom left: YA, top right: O, bottom right: NG. In this glyph the O modifies the YA and makes it YO.


A possible handwritten version of myong, but keep in mind, these glyphs would rarely ever be handwritten.



guja /gu:Za:/ - n. water, stream, creek

In the above you see an example of a disyllabic glyph. Disyllabic glyphs only occur when the second syllable is one of the following nuclei: a, o, ja, ha, ya, la, ra. There are occasions when these are modifying the preceding nucleus and not acting as second syllables and the occurrences are based on phonotactic rules. E.g. ya-a is /ja:.a:/, but ya-o is /jo:/.



n’ha /n@?.h\a:/ - n. a cut, gash, slash v. to cut, hack, slice

In this sample you see that only two radical positions are used, this is perfectly acceptable. They are variable to give way to more “pictographic” possibilities.



toj /to:Z/ - n. warrior, fighter, combatant

This sample shows how the secondary nucleus position can be used without the first, the glyph remains readable.



Another example of a handwritten glyph, toj.

A longer sample:



There are 16 Replies
Load all posts On page: 1 2
  settingsSettings

Interesting. I like the handwritten examples---very elegant.

Posted July 11th, 2008 by lryda mbazha
View Source Quote Report

Beautifully systematic. I'd bet you could even write a program that could convert the nearly digital nature of your radicals into the written script form if you wanted to, and automatically generate pronunciation (pretty easily) to spit out a dictionary in no time.

I love algorithmic systems like this; and your consistency will be beautiful.

I suppose the only problem might be, in respect to a real language, it would lack natural inconsistencies. Do you have any plans to muck it up a bit after you finish the basics?

Posted July 12th, 2008 by Blake
View Source Quote Report
Blake
 

I suppose the only problem might be, in respect to a real language, it would lack natural inconsistencies. Do you have any plans to muck it up a bit after you finish the basics?


You've pinned down the main issue I have with the script...it's extremely artificial in it's systematical nature.

I am uncertain about few things, like the values of a few of the radicals, and the respective positions of the onset, coda etc...these are all things subject to change.

My immediate plan is to create the glyphs for the 358 base syllables and see how I feel about the overall outcome, aesthetically and functionally. At that point I will have a better grasp on the script and will feel better about making long term decisions about both the minor and major details.

Posted July 12th, 2008 by Sano
View Source Quote Report
Sano
 

It was brought to my attention that not all browsers support the transparent backgrounds of my images so I am posting links to the images with plain white backgrounds for those that can't see the images.













Posted July 12th, 2008 by Sano
View Source Quote Report
Sano
 

It was brought to my attention that not all browsers support the transparent backgrounds of my images so I am posting links to the images with plain white backgrounds for those that can't see the images.











I can see them beautifully.
I can tell how the glyph's shapes resemble the schematicized pictures of the things they stand for.
I like the system as a whole; it looks similar to Hangul.
Are your "radicals" like the triconsonantal roots, or like the "radical-and-determiner" and "semantic-and-phonetic" logograms of standard Chinese writing? Or like Hangul? (Or like some in some ways and others in other ways; or like some, but more like others?)

Posted July 12th, 2008 by eldin raigmore
View Source Quote Report

The radicals convey phonemic information eldin, not semantic or determinative , that makes them mostly like Hangul. I thought that was apparent.

Posted July 12th, 2008 by Sano
View Source Quote Report
Sano
 

http://www.omniglot.com/writing/ngala.php
Simon was eager to add this page.

Posted July 12th, 2008 by Sano
View Source Quote Report
Sano
 

I thought that was apparent.
It wasn't. Now it is.

Posted July 13th, 2008 by chiarizio
View Source Quote Report

I thought that was apparent.
It wasn't. Now it is.


How could you have missed it?

Posted July 13th, 2008 by Sano
View Source Quote Report
Sano
 



An example of a dual glyph pictograph.

mogu /mo:.gu:/ - n. sleep, rest, relaxation | v. to sleep, lay, rest

I'm still working on a viable tri-glyph pictograph, but after much thought I'm fairly sure there is at least one.

Posted July 14th, 2008 by Sano
View Source Quote Report
Sano
 
Next page Load rest of pages On page: /
Reply to: Ngala
Enter your message here

Rules | Report Issue | Request Feature | Roadmap Facebook Page | Discord Group
GTX0 © 2009-2020 Xhin GameTalk © 1999-2008 lives on
You are not forgotten, Kevin, Liane, Norma, Jason, and Garrett