Roleplaying Video Games Entertainment & Media Politics & World
General Spirituality & Philosophy Worldbuilding Creative Forum
The Sports Center Science, Math, & Technology The Nostalgia Forum Sexuality
Community feedback needed: add_comment New add_comment New request

Worldbuilding

another proposed marriage custom

Posted 8 Months ago by chiarizio

I got this idea after reading a Robert Silverberg novel whose title I can’t remember.
I don’t remember whether this was the system his conculture used or it just made me think of it.

Each parent P has contracts or alliances or agreements with two to four (usually four) other persons of about the same generation, that P’s sons or daughters can marry the daughters or sons of the ally.

P has an agreement with one man, M1, that P’s sons can marry M1’s daughters.
P also has an agreement with one woman, W1, that P’s sons can marry W1’s daughters.
Normally P won’t choose a married couple; that is normally M1 and W1 won’t be husband-and-wife to each other. They might be OK with that if each of M1 and W1 has a daughter by some other spouse.

P has an agreement with one man, M2, that P’s daughters can marry M2’s sons.
P also has an agreement with one woman, W2, that P’s daughters can marry W2’s sons.
Normally P won’t choose a married couple; that is normally M2 and W2 won’t be husband-and-wife to each other. They might be OK with that if each of M2 and W2 has a son by some other spouse.

The main purpose of the arrangement is that as soon as one of P’s children comes of age they’ll already have four pools of possible candidate spouses to court and perhaps betrothe.
Namely; suppose someone’s son S has just come of age.
He can date the daughters of his father’s male ally;
He can date the daughters of his mother’s male ally;
He can date the daughters of his father’s female ally;
And he can date the daughters of his mother’s female ally.

Ideally each one of those four pools will contain a girl who is not in any of the other pools.

I’m sure the reader can work out for themselves the analogous situation of someone’s daughter D who has just come of age.

....

There is a secondary purpose to the system; a person wants as many allies as possible, and maybe as wide a variety of allies as possible.

So ordinarily M1 and M2 won’t be the same guy; that is, the male ally whose daughters will accept courtship from P’s sons, won’t be the same male ally from whose sons P’s daughters will accept courtship.
Likewise W1 and W2 will ordinarily be different women.

Nothing I’ve said so far prevents M1 and W2 from being a married couple; nor M2 and W1.

.....

If a marriageable person doesn’t otherwise have a possible spouse to court, they will usually consider courting, or accepting courtship from, some appropriate child of one of the allies of one of their parents.
This might just as likely be because the marriageable person in question has taken too long to become betrothed, as because they have not been out in society long enough.
And of course there’s the possibility their spouse died, or their betrothed changed their mind.

....

There are several assumptions here.

  • People commonly marry someone other than a child of a parent’s ally. The parents’ allies’ children are available for first consideration and possible last chances. Lots of people marry the first person they ever date, but it’s probably more common to shop around a bit.

  • People commonly have more than one marriage in their lives. This may be “serial polygynandry” driven by widows and widowers; or by divorce; or there may be bigynandry.

  • People commonly have more than one son and more than one daughter.

    From this we can deduce that the world is probably not too crowded. Either society wants more people, or the mortality rate is high enough that to keep the population up people want many children or society wants many married couples.

    .....

    Well, what does anyone think?

  • There are 2 Replies


    I really think that the “allies” one chooses, one will prefer be neither each other’s spouse nor each other’s sibling.
    So say somebody P picks a man M1 and a woman W1 to agree that P’s sons can marry M1’s daughters and W1’s daughters;
    and picks a man M2 and a woman W2 to agree that P’s daughters can marry M2’s sons and W2’s sons.
    I think P will prefer not only that none of {M1, W1} nor {M1, W2} nor {M2, W1} nor {M2, W2} be a husband-wife pair,
    but also that none of them be a brother-sister pair;
    and also prefer that M1 and M2 not be each other’s brother, and that W1 and W2 not be each other’s sister.

    In other words P will prefer a variety of “allies”.

    P’s allies will prefer their own other allies to not be any of P’s spouses or siblings.

    P’s sons will have four pools of women to court as first and as last resort.
    Likewise P’s daughters will have four pools of men to court as first and as last resort.
    How often these arrangements might lead to a marriage of some child of P to some child of one of P’s “allies” might vary over time and place.

    P’s children’s other parent will have their own allies; P’s child might marry a child of their other parent’s ally.
    Or not marry any child of any ally of either parent, but instead marry someone completely different.
    However I expect that quite often someone will marry one of the children of one of the allies of one of their parents.
    In fact people who marry more than once will probably marry a parent’s ally’s child at least once, even if frequently not as a first spouse.

    A parent’s ally’s child probably won’t be a first-cousin. I have to think about it, but, maybe, a parent’s ally’s child will never be a first-cousin!

    4 Months ago
    chiarizio
     

    I forgot to explicitly say;
    Nobody will want any of their own spouses or siblings to be their “ally” as described above.

    1 Month ago
    chiarizio
     

    Reply to: another proposed marriage custom

    Username
    Password