Ending Genocide by Ending Race
Posted: Posted September 8th, 2018 by chiarizio
On Facebook today a schoolteacher posted that she had asked her class to figure out how genocide could be eliminated. They decided (after a lot of work, I imagine) the issue was very complex, and there probably was no way to end it. She then asked us if we could think of a way.
I replied that I had thought of a way, but I don’t think it will ever be tried.
Remember in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, that there was an effort to end school segregation, by bussing children from one school-district to another? And school-segregation did “end”, though maybe not because of bussing, and there are continuing attempts to evade integration.
I suggested a global, worldwide analog to bussing, governing residence, workplace, and mate-selection.
What kind of specifics would something like that have?
I suggest something like the following.
A young adult must settle a minimum distance of 1,000 nautical miles from his/her own birthplace, and the birthplace(s), residence(s), and graves of either of their parents, any of their siblings, any of their grandparents, and any of their aunts and/or uncles: UNLESS they have at least two siblings or first cousins —— at least one of each sex —— who has so settled. And they must reside within such an area for at least 18 (20? 35?) years, not traveling more than 250 (125? 500?) nautical miles from their new home. (333 nautical miles might be as good or better or even best. Also, maybe there would merely be a limit to the durations and/or frequencies of trips further than the limit.)
Also: a young adult must marry a mate of the opposite sex who likewise was born and raised at least 1000 nautical miles from the first-mentioned young adult’s birthplace and residence, and from the birthplaces and residences and graves of that first-mentioned young adult’s parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, and uncles; and, the mate’s parents’ and siblings’ and grandparents’ birthplaces, residences, and graves, must be at least 1000 nautical miles distant from the first-mentioned young adult’s places of birth and of upbringing; UNLESS the said young adult has at least two (four?) siblings or first-cousins —— at least one (two?) of each sex —— who is currently in such a marriage.
After five or six generations, there’d have been so much “race-mixing” or “miscegenation”, and so large a majority of the population would be a mixture of at least 4 races, that it would be obvious, to even the most obtuse, that the idea that humanity is divided into “races”, is purest fiction. Or that’s what I guess.
If “genocide” means “the murder of a race”, and everyone agrees there aren’t any races, there can’t be any more genocide.
Why? I basically pulled all of the numbers out of a hat.
I have some rationale for the 1000 nautical miles.
First I thought 1000 kilometers is too small; so is 1000 statute miles.
1000 nautical miles is 16 and 2/3 degrees.
That’s a bit more than half the north-south width of Australia.
It’s more than 2/3 the north-south width of the contiguous continental mainland U.S.A.
And it’s a bit less than half of the north-south width of mainland Europe.
So anyone born in the center of any of those places, would have to either relocate to, or seek a spouse from, a different continent (or whatever the USA is), or the extreme edges of their home continent/union.
The required exogamy would accomplish the elimination of racial distinctions within five or six generations, I think.
It might be also good to require ethnic exogamy, for ethnicities that somehow transcend race. Required religious exogamy, for instance; and/or required linguistic exogamy; and/or required occupational exogamy.
Would such policies actually produce the desired results?
Should some of the details be tweaked, or even twonked?
(I.e. minor adjustments or major adjustments)
How much resistance would there be to such a policy or policies?
How would that resistance be overcome?
Would that resistance change as time went on?
What would life be like after these policies have taken effect?
How would it come about that these policies might be implemented or imposed or decided on in the first place?
I welcome comment.
I’d like to tell a collaborative story set during this multigenerational event.
There are 3 Replies
Reply to: Ending Genocide by Ending Race