?>
GTX0 NewestRepliesHottestMy Active
NIFE UpdatesRoadmapRequests | HelpDiscuss Game Worlds



My posts in world are being tagged for no reason. My views may be controversial, but that's why the disclaimer is there. While my views are offensive as revealing the truth about women is automatically going to offend some, but that's no reason to tag my posts.

I have been censured for too long, and this constitutes an abuse of power, especially since I wasn't even making any "misogynist" comments in the tagged posts. Btw, that thread and another one that was deleted too in unwarranted fashion created a lot of discussion, something you should want on your moribund site. For some reason, whenever you talk about women, you get censored. You can talk about any other groups, but not women.

It would be nice if my tagged thread about the teacher killing the hamster and my posts in the child support thread could be restored. Despite what Famov says, I wasn't trolling, only presenting the truth, but I guess some people will label things they disagree with as trolling.

The female of the species is deadlier than the male. -Rudyard Kipling
There are 16 Replies
Page:
1 2 Load all posts
settingsSettings

You regularly violate the global rules, so get over it.

Posted March 29th by Cruinn-Annuin

I don't see how I'm breaking global rules, but whatever. I see how it is. The SJWs have taken over this site, and that means bullying, unjustified censorship, and silencing of any views that don't jibe with the blue pill shit we're inundated with on a daily basis. The whole point of this is to prevent any criticism from the mainstream narrative. Women are wonderful, women can do no wrong, its the narrative here, and to criticize it is the same as trolling even though I always remain professional and calm when I debate this stuff.

They want to cover up women with a protective shell of never being accountable for anything. They never do wrong. Even when they do something as egregious as murdering defenseless animals, selling their kids for sex, or despoiling men of all their money.

Women are always perfec.t

Edited March 29th by Jubei
Jubei
This path is one that I have chosen myself

Despite countless articles demonstrating exact examples of what I say to be true, all the mods have is "stop trolling" while holding their ears. Naturally, that's why more more and men are running from the plantation everyday, fewer and fewer Americans are having sex, and MGTOWS numbers are skyrocketing because all we do is hate women and that...attracts people? I guess? Oh right, we're all incels.

It's unjust to stop criticism. I won't listen to these white knights. The cuck scent is strong, and the feminists have four or five guys jizz leaking down their thighs for cucks to lick up when they cash in on their good boy points.

These people are stuck in a world where if their perfect little creatures are insulted, or the glorious cult of feminism is criticized, they don't see it. Weak people and man haters.


Posted March 30th by Jubei
Jubei
This path is one that I have chosen myself

As an accidental aside, posters like this are the reason I would support a firmer block tool. If I decide to block Jubei, I should have power over when and how I unblock him. Why bother with a tool that lets a user protect their experience if you're just going to circumvent it with the overbearing and condescending idea that you're going to make us get along?

Edited March 30th by Cruinn-Annuin

I don't see what's so offensive about me. I even said that women and men are innately equal. You saw my results in the political test, and I believe in equality. If the thread hadn't been tagged maybe you would have a better understanding of my views, but I don't care anymore.

I will be leaving this site since it's a waste of time to write up posts if they're going to be deleted.

Posted March 30th by Jubei
Jubei
This path is one that I have chosen myself

The logical error i see your'e making is that... basically
1. When men act wrongfully it is not an indictment of their gender or an indication of their true nature
2. When women act wrongfully, it somehow is. you're holding them to a different standard, an unfair one. and you're filtering out evidence that may contradict your beliefs while holding onto evidence (however random and outlying) that supports them.

But there's no point in trying to debate you. I'm not going to change your mind, or you mine. so let me cut to the chase and explain how I'm utilizing censorship in the Creative forum where I tagged one of your posts earleir today: your right to free speech ends where someone else's (even – oh no – a women's) right to safety and wellbeing begins. There's a hierarchy to these rights. has nothng to do with whether ot not I think you're trolling. And when you make a post that is an attack against a fundamental, uncontrollable aspect of an individual's identity – without even having been provoked by the individual that might happen to read it – it's absolutely a threat to their sense of wellbeing/safety, esp. their sense of wellbeing/safety within the particualr community in which they come across it. So it is far more important to prevent this harm to our community . than to protect your right to say whatever you want.

Posted March 30th by Cetasaurus
Cetasaurus
Formerly KM8

Firstly, I apologize for making that thread in your forum. But my intent was never to make anyone feel unsafe. I had made a thread recommending that book in world where it got tagged for no reason, and that book highlights exactly what's wrong with Feminism, metoo, and social media and the internet in general.

Liberalism in 2019 also makes people unsafe. Keep in mind, I'm not even a right-winger, but liberals in America hate men, they hate white people, and they hate straight people, and that I imagine would make the bulk of this site feel unsafe too.

We're subjected to stuck up SJW pricks telling us we're lesser persons because of they way we were born. This site is so feminist that saying that women can rape underage boys is regarded as trolling. Tellingly, when females commit sexual assaults against men, it's not a crime; this makes me feel unsafe as well.



Posted March 30th by Jubei
Jubei
This path is one that I have chosen myself

Well if it makes you feel any better im’ nkt a liberal. And I have issues with modern liberal feminism as well (though, I’d guess not the same ones as you). And if anybody – man, woman, or nonbinary – commits sexual assault against you in the Creative forum of GTX0, I’ll be sure to tag and ban them too. Not sure what I said to make you doubt that or even bring that up.

Posted March 30th by Cetasaurus
Cetasaurus
Formerly KM8

Being critical of the comical excesses of modern feminism is not why your content is being removed. The problem is that you are clearly not being sincere, and what you post leaves no room open for conversation by design.

Maybe "MGTOW" is something someone over the age of fourteen can actually believes in, in which case the only evident direction these men seem to be going in is that of a self inflicted gunshot wound at the age of 38. Again, that's not why I'm tagging your posts.



The song's not actually relevant to this conversation, but I've always liked it.

Here's the thing: You turned up out of the blue one day as an avowed Stalinist, purportedly with a long history with gametalk despite posting under a new name and no one knowing who you were, and mimicking the conspicuously destructive mode of behavior that we've tried to curb multiple times in the past. I don't know what kind of perverse sense of satisfaction people get out of creating sock puppet accounts on decrepit old message boards, but I am confident that you are one of them. I am done tolerating it.

Posted March 30th by Famov

I've always thought Jubei and Post-Wall Olga were the same person. Why did you tag my thread to him though?

Edited March 30th by I killed Mufasa
I killed Mufasa
long live the king

They are the same person. Your thread was tagged because you were responding to a thread that was locked. The purpose of a lock is to prevent a thread from continuing.

Unfortunately we now have a system now where replies bump threads to the top of the front page, which means that the trash Esther Vilar thread was continuing despite having long since run any kind of useful course. The transparent anti-women trolling is going to stop immediately, the impetus for this decision being the glut of such threads (most of which have been tagged) that have been populating the front page.



Posted March 30th by Famov

You know what, nevermind, it's fine. I was only annoyed because it directly affected me. But overall I actually agree with your decision. That MGTOW shit is super annoying and he won't shut up about it.

Edited March 30th by I killed Mufasa
I killed Mufasa
long live the king

Thank you, Famov.

Posted March 30th by Cruinn-Annuin

-man uses woman for sex: OK
-women uses man for money: not OK, indicates all women are users
-men reject societal expectations, + hate women and call out (real or perceived) injustices: MGTOW = enlightened and awesome
-women reject societal expectations, +/- hate men and call out (real or perceived) injustices: feminine = idiotic and evil

Yes, very logical.

Your posts aren't getting tagged because we're so afraid and offended by your "ideas," but because they're breaking the rules (calling whole groups of people names, generally being below quality, repetitive nonsense despite you thinking it's some smart material or something). I even tried to talk to you, Sir King of Logic, with empathy, and you just had weird examples of your overweight BPD girlfriend. Then you just kept using the word "thot" unironically, which may be breaking the rules already, IDK.

Also, people can understand what you're saying and disagree. That is what's happening. I don't know if you're just trolling, but come on.

Edited March 30th by Ophelia

I feel like we should have one post-wall olga thread, the same way we should have one #85 thread. The reason *I've* been tagging the extra ones is because the site isn't nearly active enough for more than one thread that's going to get zero constructive replies. (Or probably just a hard zero). If that changes, well, Famov's right too -- we don't need a ton of misogynistic posts either.

Posted March 30th by Xhin
Xhin
Nature is beautiful
Load next page Load rest of pages
Reply to: @Xhin
Enter your message here

Site Rules | Complaints Process | Give Feedback Facebook Page
GTX0 © 2009-2019 Xhin GameTalk © 1999-2008 lives on